matlab r2016.a 9.0.0 (MathWorks Inc)
MathWorks Inc is a verified supplier 
90
Structured Review
MathWorks Inc
matlab r2016.a 9.0.0
Matlab R2016.A 9.0.0, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/matlab+r2016%2Ea+9%2E0%2E0/pm36857975-64-5-9
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Matlab R2016.A 9.0.0, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/matlab+r2016%2Ea+9%2E0%2E0/pm36857975-64-5-9
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab r2016.a 9.0.0 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
90/100 stars
Images
Related Articles
other:Article Title: Biomechanical comparison of titanium miniplates versus a variety of CAD/CAM plates in mandibular reconstruction. Article Snippet: a Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité – Universätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany b Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Straße 2, 10178, Berlin, Germany c Institute of Biomechanics, TUHH Hamburg University of Technology, Denickestraße 15, 21703, Hamburg, Germany Article Title: Patient-specific miniplates versus patient-specific reconstruction plate: A biomechanical comparison with 3D-printed plates in mandibular reconstruction. Article Snippet: Background: Patient-specific 3D-printed miniplates for free flap fixation in mandibular reconstruction were recently associated with enhanced osseous union.. Higher mechanical strains resulting from these plates are discussed as reasons, but biomechanical studies are missing.. This study aims to examine, whether patient-specific 3D-printed miniplates provide an increased interosteotomy movement (IOM) and lower stiffness compared with reconstruction plates. Article Title: Biomechanical comparison of polylactide-based versus titanium miniplates in mandible reconstruction in vitro. Article Snippet: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record.. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article.. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. |